Julian Waters-Lynch
Journal article · Open access

The Lotus Protocol

Guidelines for multi-domain systematic literature review

Bart J. A. van Bueren and Weng Marc Lim and Naveen Donthu and Kevin Argus and Julian M. Waters-Lynch and Alvedi Sabani and Mark A. A. M. Leenders

Complex problems increasingly sit across several knowledge domains at once, but most review methods still assume a single field or a single intersection.

What the paper argues

The article introduces the Lotus Protocol: a structured method for reviewing evidence across multiple domains and their intersections. Instead of treating a complex topic as one search problem, the protocol maps the domains, constructs corpora around each domain and overlap, and then captures contributions across the full evidence space.

The paper demonstrates the method through a review problem involving food waste, behaviour change, mobile applications, and revenue models. Its purpose is practical: to help researchers synthesise fragmented evidence without losing sight of the intersections where useful insight often appears.

Core contribution: A repeatable protocol for evidence synthesis across multiple domains and intersections

Why it matters

Many social, organisational, environmental, and technological problems are too entangled for single-domain reviews. The Lotus Protocol gives researchers a clearer way to build cumulative knowledge when the relevant literature is scattered across fields that do not normally speak to one another.

Related method

Evidence synthesis as infrastructure

This paper supports the broader research-tools stream: methods that make complex bodies of evidence easier to inspect, reuse, and extend.

View Research Tools